---
Note type: MoC
tags:
  - "#MoC"
Related projects:
  - "[[SOC301 Social Research Methods Course]]"
Related tasks: 
Related references: 
Related zettels:
  - "[[hermeneutic interpretivism]]"
  - "[[abductive analysis]]"
  - "[[coding inductive to abductive]]"
  - "[[critical discourse analysis]]"
  - "[[Gioia methodology]]"
  - "[[discourse analysis]]"
Related meeting notes: 
Related resources: 
Related people: 
aliases: 
Creation date: 2024-05-27
Last modified: 2024-05-27
---

## Fleeting notes

## General notes

### Conceptual roots and connections

### Schools of thought

### Examples

### Criticisms

### Types of [[literature review]]

- [[Systematic review]]
- [[Meta-analysis]]
- [[Conceptual review]]
- [[Narrative review]]
- [[Historical review]]
- [[Critical essay]]
- [[integrative review]]

### Reading list for [[hermeneutic interpretivism]]

- Schütz, A. (1954). Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. The Journal of Philosophy, 51(9), 257–273.
- Schütz, A. (1960). The social world and the theory of social action. Social Research, 27(4), 203–221.
- Van Maanen, J. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (4), 539–550.
- Van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
- Van Maanen, J., Sørensen, J. B., & Mitchell, T. R. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145–1154.
- Silverman, D. (1989). Six rules of qualitative research: A post-romantic argument. Symbolic Interaction, 12(2), 215–230.
- Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (4th ed.). SAGE.
- Silverman, D. (2017). How was it for you? The interview society and the irresistible rise of the (poorly analyzed) interview. Qualitative Research, 17(2), 144–158.
- Silverman, D. (2020). Interpreting qualitative data (6th ed.). SAGE

